Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 08:33

Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
South Korea’s Venus-focused cubesat advances as larger missions face NASA cuts - SpaceNews
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Why are people saying that Trump is fat when he is an athletic 6 foot 3 and 215 pounds?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What is the STAR interview method?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Unfortunately For Some, These iPhone & iPad Models Won't Be Getting iOS 26 - SlashGear
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
What’s next?
Truck crashes into store at N.J. shopping mall, police say - NJ.com
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Cher’s Son Elijah Blue Allman Hospitalized After ‘Acting Erratically’ - Rolling Stone
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
China Rare-Earth Magnet Maker Gets Green Light for US Exports - Bloomberg